Hola a todos!
Para los que estéis pensando en contratar los 20 megas, al parecer el ping mejora bastante... No tengo fastpath, pero se asemeja (diferencia de 10ms) al fastpath de los que no viven en Madrid :-) O eso es lo que he estado viendo por los foros :P
Mirar unas cuantas pruebas:
@:~$ ping www.terra.es
PING www.terra.es (213.4.130.210) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www.terra.es (213.4.130.210): icmp_seq=1 ttl=118 time=35.5 ms
64 bytes from www.terra.es (213.4.130.210): icmp_seq=2 ttl=118 time=35.4 ms
64 bytes from www.terra.es (213.4.130.210): icmp_seq=3 ttl=118 time=34.4 ms
64 bytes from www.terra.es (213.4.130.210): icmp_seq=4 ttl=118 time=36.4 ms
64 bytes from www.terra.es (213.4.130.210): icmp_seq=5 ttl=118 time=35.0 ms
64 bytes from www.terra.es (213.4.130.210): icmp_seq=6 ttl=118 time=36.3 ms
64 bytes from www.terra.es (213.4.130.210): icmp_seq=7 ttl=118 time=34.6 ms
64 bytes from www.terra.es (213.4.130.210): icmp_seq=8 ttl=118 time=36.0 ms
^C
--- www.terra.es ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7006ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.457/35.508/36.441/0.719 ms
@:~$ ping www.jazztel.com
PING www.jazztel.com (212.106.220.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 20.220.106.212.static.jazztel.es (212.106.220.20): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=36.6 ms
64 bytes from 20.220.106.212.static.jazztel.es (212.106.220.20): icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=35.7 ms
64 bytes from 20.220.106.212.static.jazztel.es (212.106.220.20): icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=35.8 ms
64 bytes from 20.220.106.212.static.jazztel.es (212.106.220.20): icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=35.6 ms
64 bytes from 20.220.106.212.static.jazztel.es (212.106.220.20): icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=37.8 ms
64 bytes from 20.220.106.212.static.jazztel.es (212.106.220.20): icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=36.2 ms
^C
--- www.jazztel.com ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5006ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.668/36.346/37.888/0.756 ms
@:~$ ping www.elotrolado.net
PING elotrolado.net (195.78.228.226) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from marta.eol.us (195.78.228.226): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms
64 bytes from marta.eol.us (195.78.228.226): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms
64 bytes from marta.eol.us (195.78.228.226): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms
64 bytes from marta.eol.us (195.78.228.226): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms
64 bytes from marta.eol.us (195.78.228.226): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms
64 bytes from marta.eol.us (195.78.228.226): icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms
64 bytes from marta.eol.us (195.78.228.226): icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms
64 bytes from marta.eol.us (195.78.228.226): icmp_seq=8 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms
^C
--- elotrolado.net ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 11141ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.633/35.154/38.152/1.311 ms
@:~$ ping 20minutos.es
PING 20minutos.es (85.62.13.169) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 85.62.13.169.static.abi.uni2.es (85.62.13.169): icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=38.5 ms
64 bytes from 85.62.13.169.static.abi.uni2.es (85.62.13.169): icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=37.0 ms
64 bytes from 85.62.13.169.static.abi.uni2.es (85.62.13.169): icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=36.4 ms
64 bytes from 85.62.13.169.static.abi.uni2.es (85.62.13.169): icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=35.5 ms
64 bytes from 85.62.13.169.static.abi.uni2.es (85.62.13.169): icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=35.5 ms
64 bytes from 85.62.13.169.static.abi.uni2.es (85.62.13.169): icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=36.5 ms
^C
--- 20minutos.es ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5009ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.500/36.596/38.518/1.035 ms
Si pusieran fastpath, para los que juegan, les iría de fábula.